To
answer the second part first. What you have never had, you
do not miss. This is in the same vain, as when I was asked
by a University Students during a "Question and Answer
Session", if I missed having a "home". And I replied; Out
of thirty-five years of marriage, I lived in "houses" few
were the times I would have called them "homes".. They
were in the most part; an"adversarial" training barracks.
I have accepted and decided that I have two
daughters. Yet, the "relative realty' is; I have no
daughters. I have a son yet no son. And I have seven
grandchildren yet no grandchildren. Each has
chosen, I hope on their own volition not to communicate
which of course is their prerogative, their preference.?
How do I feel about their choices? I would prefer it to
be different, but so be it.
Ironically, I am in a way like my children who have
believed and still do; that they have a father, but no
father. But where we differ lies in 'knowing and
understanding'. Why this dilemma is so?? I
thought possibly as they grew into adulthood they could
shed the grave clothes of the past. And learn
that life is not black and white. There are many shades
of gray in between the gaps of living. That things
perceived, seen or heard are not necessarily, true
reality.
One does not need to be a professional therapist to
understand that a divorced mother or father can transfer their
attitudes, moods, bitterness and resentments to the
young. This sort of programming can be intentional
or involuntary by either parent after a separation or a
divorce. If one cannot let go of past histories
and allow a closure. The child or children become the
inheritors of a woman's' scorn or a fathers' hatred
as both attempt to destroy the character of each
other. Affecting and infecting the emotional
stability of the child's' adult life. These shadows
of fragmented thinking can continue to live if someone
is continually "breathing life" into them. The 'good
mom' and the 'bad dad' scenario or vice
versa is an extension of an unresolved marital
relationship. Has nothing to do with some overt
act of a child or children. When either parent purposely
programs or manipulates a child's' relationship against
the other parent. The child's freedom becomes
compromised and violated. The consequences of such an
act on the part of the parent can affect how a child
will relate to others in or out of marriage..
All three of my children have reached adulthood
but are still living with their mothers' "ghosts of
yesteryear". How sad! In a sense I said
that I have no family. This is not completely
true; I have a large extended family because of the
"World Walk". I have become part of many families and
they of me. I have many adopted nieces, nephews,
grandsons and granddaughters. I have spoken to over a
thousand educational institutions both private and
governmental; from primary level to the University
level. Met with students, teachers and parents. To many
students I am "Uncle Hawk", to others I am an elder
brother or a grandfather. But the most cherished name is
a Friend. Recently in a dialogue group, a young lady
referred to me as "being comfortable". Someone
asked what she meant? Her reply was: "you know, like a
safe and secure presence". "Comfortable", an interesting
expression which reminded me that I am entering the "winter"
of my years.
There are so many variables with strong subtle
influences that affect the structuring, the
stability and sustainability of a family. But there
is one overriding factor, one unit that can create the
needed environment to give the most conducive conditions
for a family to co-exist in balance, harmony and peace.
Here we are talking about the father or mother who can
create or destroy this balance, harmony and peace. How?
The how is simple; by being out of balance, harmony and
peace in their own Being. Their lack of
{self} knowledge and {self} understanding creates a
non-conducive environment for each parent and their
offspring.
For a moment lets look at a few of these variables. The
Scenario goes something like this; two people meet
possibly out of a strong physical attraction or
need. The "Chemistry" seems just right and the need is
met. They fall in love and get married. The courting,
the flirting, the coyness and innocence; the mystique,
the newness, the rapid pulse, the anticipation and the
fantasies start to fade. And the "Stars" return from
their fallen state. Because reality {relative) comes in
the front door unannounced and stands center stage. A
new "Play" is about to begin and it is called "Life".
The two actors in this sometimes "Comedy", sometimes
"Tragedy"; may have y come from two different lifestyles
or backgrounds. Raised by a different set of parents
with possible different value systems or ideology.
Possibly, each individuals' educational level differs.
Or maybe there is an age and experience gap. Add to this
the many different reasons people hold for getting
married. And we have the making of a Love Story to be
told or a Tragedy to unfold.
As we know there are no guarantees in life but the odds
for success can be increased if both individuals upon
entering a relationship bring with them a reasonable
knowledge and understanding of their own strengths and
weaknesses, as well as a sense of balance, harmony and
peace. It is this "triad" that allows each individual to
reach their own potential and in turn help others in the
family structure to reach their own potentiality. That
which they have always been but simply have forgotten,
their "Ultimate Nature".
I know there is somebody who is reading this, who is
just dying to ask: What has love got to do with all
this? Well, love if you will consider the following
definition. Has everything to do with a relationship,
all relationships; man, woman, child, the animate or
inanimate.?
Love means:
The offering up of ones' self to the
loved one.
If this is true, what kind of "self" are
we giving?
We should be giving the best of ourselves
because
We want the best, the more excellent for
those who
Are about to receive this love.
(a note)
The "self" spoken about here, is not our "finite self"
but rather our "Ultimate Self", our "Infinite Self", our
"Absolute Self", the "Imago Deo"? Choose your preference
of terminology.?
I ask: "Would you give a damaged gift, an undesirable
gift, a gift that is unworthy, one that carries the seed
of deception, harm or injury"? I think not? If we are
going to offer up ourselves, giving the "gift of
self" to another. We need to seek after the more
excellent to give. Which entails our continual growth
and evolution, so this can be a Reality..
(Wuzhou 07/2001)